Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate are innocent until proven guilty. Is that not the standard we set as civilized Nations? Or so “they” say.
Yet, after more than a decade since the allegations were said to have taken place in 2012 and 2015, provocative headlines are trending, again, with no convincing evidence or conviction of the Tate Brothers. None.
Do you find that odd?
Do you think it’s by “accident” that the media is regurgitating headlines using old quotes and old images during political turmoil?
Why is The Telegraph publishing negative Andrew Tate headlines with no founded claims, no convictions, no transparency of the accusers, and no creditable evidence? Do you think it could be for the clicks? Or, is it a distraction?
Andrew Tate on House Arrest Update
Is Andrew Tate still on house arrest? No, Andrew Tate was released from house arrest and the judge sent the case file back to the prosecution citing errors and discrepancies. Now, Andrew Tate is speaking up, yet the search “Is Andrew Tate still on house arrest update” is re-trending along with the latest round of headlines about the Tate Brothers, but is that by design?
Why are these allegations dragging out? Here is one of the top comments:
False Claims Are Common Now
Are false claims of “abuse” made by women against men common? YES! The reel below is what happens when you start speaking up against injustice. That is what happened to me in Clackamas, Oregon, USA, so you can only imagine what “they” are willing to do to someone like Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate.
False Claims Against Fathers
Have you ever seen a father falsely accused of “Stalking” for going to his Courthouse to file for the protection of his son? Funny how the false allegations always seem to start when you speak up, or is that just me? I think not, and we’ve got the facts to prove it below.
Have you ever seen a father have his EX call the cops on him 5 times in under a year during a breakup with no arrests whatsoever? The last time she called, she lied again and told them I had kicked her. The police laughed at her and told me to file a Restraining Order, so I did. About a year later after she left and I became a full time Dad to my son, she was attacking me in court. She came back demanding child support, lying about child care, and blatantly violating court orders. Later, a Judge ruled that I had to pay her $5,000 for that Restraining Order because I was only afraid my son life and not my own life. Even though my son and I were the victims, and did nothing wrong, we still had to pay her legal fees for it.
In Portland, Oregon, the cops will haul you away to jail so fast if there’s even a question you might have done anything DV related, we all know it. Yet she was allowed to keep calling the cops on me 5 times with false allegations and then totally violate my rights with the assistance of court employee (alleged Federal Mail Fraud resulting in the illegal kidnapping of my son during no warrant raid of my home, founded by Judge on final ruling and still no justice). Sadly, their action have resulted in continued neglect/abuse of my son’s needs and safety (allegedly).
If total violation of rights and attacks like this are allowed on American fathers to interfere with family court and gain child support money, what do you think “they” will do to one of the most outspoken male voices of our generation like Andrew Tate? Answer, they go on a full-court media blitz Wrap-Up Smear.
Enter The Telegraph and BBC News with unfounded provocative headlines.
The Telegraph News Changing Timelines in Andrew Tate Court Cases
Now, it seems like the timelines are changing as reported by The Telegraph News in the UK, who also seems to have a case of TDS as seen with “Donald Trump” in their main navigation front and center. Very telling, and I am not “MAGA” saying that, but any online professional can confirm that putting Trump in your upper navigation says a lot, but we’ll let you decide.
May 2025, The Telegraph reported the Tate Brother allegations supposedly happened “between 2012 and 2015”, and today’s headline using a quote from an officer clearly states that The Tate Brothers are “accused of manipulating” between “November 2014 and December 2021.”
Interesting.
Why is The Telegraph reporting on old allegations as if they are new headlines and citing themselves using old quotes with different victim timelines?
Don’t you think The Telegraph had trouble finding a current pic of the Tate Brothers?
Andrew Tate discusses Wrap-Up Smear on PBD Podcast
While on the legendary PBD Podcast, Andrew Tate discussed the Nancy Pelosi style wrap-up smear tactics as described by Nancy Pelosi.
Using Unfounded Quotes in Headlines
Crafting unfounded claims in headlines using quotes is nothing new, but very telling for someone in media who knows what they’re looking at. If you don’t get it, let me explain.
When you want to say something that’s not true, all you have to do is get someone else to say it for you and then cite them as your source in a quote. Simple. Easy. Especially in such a corrupt day and age.
Notice that nearly the entire headline is a quote that doubles as allegations presented in such a way that you are encouraged to accept it as fact, even though there is still no proof or conviction after years of scrutiny.
After years of investigations and countless News reports regurgitating old information, no concrete or even half-way creditable information has come to light.
Very telling.
Classic Wrap-Up Smear Media Maneuver
This is looking more and more like a classic wrap-up smear media maneuver if you ask me. Notice how they are using the same images, that’s not a mistake. Images don’t just fall out of nowhere, they are placed with intent, always.
Why would they use the same images? To make sure you remember the old headlines because that’s all they’ve got to push in my opinion. Especially after the recent ruling to withhold the names of the accuser(s).
How convenient, don’t you think?
Community “Noted” Police
UK Police have been officially “Noted” more than once, indicating that some reports from police might not be fully accurate. Do you think it’s possible that the police quote in The Telegraph headline could be inaccurate?
If the police are known to be misleading, how can you trust an old quote from an officer with no founded proof of the allegations? You can’t.
Jake Munro explains it nicely in this reel:
Follow: instagram.com/thejakemunro
Update:
Oregon Police Fail to Investigate
As we were publishing this article, The Guyer Show by AmericanAbsolutist.com tried to file a police report, and the officers refused to investigate the crime. Do you think that failure to investigate is unbecoming of an officer?
The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of the Wrap-Up Smear Campaign is Plain Sight: The Telegraph Backlinking to The Telegraph
This is comical for anyone in the know #iykyk Only a newb NPC player on the grid would not see the lack of substance behind the links on The Telegraph. As someone who makes backlinks to verify information for ranking purposes, I can tell you linking back to yourself is the oldest trick in the book.
It’s so prevalent, we outline exactly how the wrap-up smear works with a play-by-play of how the industry uses backlinks to self-verify information. It’s the same backlink techniques that people like me use to verify a plumber’s DIY Tips to be accurate. Only used to verify allegation as fact online using falsified or lacking information. By linking back to your own information as seen below, you game the system.
Is it “misinformation” according to the standards? No, because they are dancing with words, using quotes in headlines as if they are factual.
Very clever. I’ve done the same thing, and it’s way more common than you might think. Hopefully, you will notice it more from now on, and every time you do it will bring you back in time to this article. You will remember the Tate Brothers Wrap-Up Smear series and see through the headline quotes crafted to mislead, and you will find the truth within hiding past the clickbait, whatever that may be.
What’s even more interesting is that they used the exact same photo from the article in the first link. Weird. Do you think that’s a mistake? Nope. By design. It’s 2026, so you don’t get to play dumb, anymore. Please start using your brain, for that person reading who still doesn’t see Telegraph Telegraphing their likely intent:
The Telegraph Verifying Themselves by Backlinking to The Telegraph
What in the self-marketing click-bait is going on here? Before we dive into the 2nd backlink from The Telegraph to The Telegraph to verify that The Telegraph is telling the “truth” about Andrew Tate, let’s take a look at the ads with the ads.
We jokingly call it “Ad Inception” when you have an ad within an ad. This feel like Andrew Tate Ad Inception to me with how they are coat-tailing Andrew Tate’s fame for clicks with their articles. Well, two can play at that game.
Historically, Andrew Tate has been one of the most searched individuals in the world. It makes sense The Telegraph would be keen to take advantage of the “Andrew Tate Effect” when it comes to clicks. How do we know? We did it, too.
The first reel seen embed above has spiked in view counts because of traffic to other Andrew Tate articles. It’s notably higher than average, and the reach was near plateau prior to the embed. Now, the combined relevancy of embed with virility of Andrew Tate has added approximately 30%+ increase in views or more. (4.5k on FB under Ban and 450k+ on Insta with notable increase after plateau near just under 300k. Meaning app 150k+ can directly be attributed to the Andrew Tate Effect reel embeds within Andrew Tate articles. In part from the views via ranking on Andrew Tate Keywords. Part increased visibility within the stream driven by the embed+views).
The Andrew Tate Effect
Now that you know about the Andrew Tate Effect, do you think it’s odd that the article in behind a membership/paywall is loaded with their own ads? “Economic Intelligence” no less. With the Tate Brothers strong financial background, it’s laughable if you don’t see them using the traffic to promote a high-dollar segment such as financial, and even more funny if you do see it because it’s a classic up way to monetize a wrap-up smear.
We are either laughing with you at the headlines, or at you for believing them, but Andrew Tate headlines are a joke at this point no matter how you slice it. If it’s not coming from Andrew himself, be sure to go check his actual profiles/pages before you buy into the clickbait Wrap-Up Smear headlines.
Closer Look at The Telegraph 2nd Link to Themselves
When you take a closer look at the 2nd link article, things continue to fall apart. Not just about timelines anymore, which is bad enough, but now we have the exact same recycled rhetoric in the opening verbiage.
Do you find it odd that Andrew Tate recently spoke up about the mistreatment of women in the UK at the hands of corrupt politicians allowing rape gangs to proliferate unchecked? Andrew Tate spoke up and he’s back in the headlines. Weird.
The real headline is that the courts denied the release of the accusers names, and may have changed the timeline. How convenient, don’t you think?
Without transparency, and no real concrete evidence or convictions in the case, it’s starting to look more like the Tate Brothers really are innocent, as they have stated from the beginning.
Very telling if you ask me. Anonymous accusations with no real concrete proof should not be accepted as fact by the media, but when it’s Andrew Tate, the truth doesn’t seem to matter as long as they get the clicks.
Pearling Things and the “Misogynist” Influencer Andrew Tate
In today’s world, facts are twisted and words are manipulated or over-used to the point they lose meaning. For example, the same people who deny science behind child autism rates and still try to tell you that the jab was a “vaccine” to this very day after changing the definition, are the same people scream “Feminism good” and Misogynist bad, without ever looking at the root cause behind any of it. When you take a closer look at some of the latest’s studies, you see high divorce rates with women, high DV rates in lesbian households, and high child abuse stats inflicted by women. If you don’t believe me, just tune into one episode of Pearl.
In this episode of Pearl seen below, a female divorce attorney refers to marriage in today’s world as slavery. The system is so twisted against men that even good women have started speaking up against their viscous female counterparts.
The question then becomes, is Andrew Tate really the big mean “Misogynist” the media likes to portray for clicks? Or is he responding to viscous attacks from women in a world that stacks the deck against masculinity? You decide, but watch a few episodes of Pearl first.
True Victims Deserve Justice
The dramatic pause is over, and the people can see through the Andrew Tate lies being spread like wildfire in the UK and CNN, once again.
WE THE PEOPLE of America demand true justice for real victims, like the ones being ignored in countless files in every Nation. Therefore we demand that the prosecution produce evidence for conviction, or drop the charges. The American people have the power of free speech, unlike the UK where you can get locked up for FB Posts) which will reign down like fire upon fake news outlets and their publishers with the proverbial sword of truth to expose them.
The fact courts have blocked the release of accusers leads me to believe there are none, or at least none that are valid. What do you think?
Remember, these are the same courts that Andrew Tate spoke up about in defense of women’s rights for allowing hundreds of thousands of alleged criminals walk while parroting headlines with seemingly baseless claims.
Instead of reporting on the true victims and atrocities being ignored, mainstream media always seems to find the Tate Brothers.
Continuing to lodge seemingly false allegations without conviction is a discredit to the entire legal system and ALL victims deserve better. Hundreds of thousands of victim cries for help go unanswered, while MSM networks such as The Telegraph, BBC, and CNN can be seen gaslighting for political purposes.
However, with each passing day it looks more and more like Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate are the victims of a Wrap-Up Smear as described by Nancy Pelosi.
No Conviction for Over a Decade
It’s been over a decade since the first allegations were said to have taken place, and years of litigation, with no conviction whatsoever.
Do you think it’s possible that these kinds of false allegations may be crafted to distract people from other more serious realities, such as the 250,000 women in the recent report exposing grooming gangs that ignored by Keir Starmer for years?
Do you think Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate should be considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law? Or, do their rights not matter because someone labeled them as the “bad” guys?
If the Tate Brothers are guilty, then prove it or drop the charges. Otherwise, with each passing day the system sullies themselves by pandering currently unfounded claims, more and more people will wake up from the haze to see the true crimes being ignored by the gaslighting Wrap-Up Smear of Andrew Tate.
NOTE: After starting this article I found the CNN Special Report about Andrew Tate’s “EMPIRE” of Abuse, and I did not see an in-depth special report by CNN about Rape Gangs which Andrew has recently spoke up against. What does that say to you? Please use your brain. True victims deserve real justice and hiding accuser names for over a decade is the cherry on top of The Telegraph Quote Headline mascaraed. Wake up.
p.s. It’s 2026 and even the BIG Screen knows that sometimes the ones labeled as the “bad guys” can sometimes be a hero in disguise. Is inspiring young men to be more masculine good, or bad? How you answer that question will determine your opinion of the Tate Brothers guilty or innocence, in my opinion, because none of it based on concrete evidence with no conviction to date, that’s for sure. We are not paid to say this and we are not monetizing this content.
Real victims deserve justice and false allegations discredit everyone. No more of this Wrap-Up Smear charades when the files have been released. Produce true evidence and real victims without a myriad of discrepancies, or drop the charges. Real victims deserve real justice and H8 is for the birds. A band of brothers standing together speaking freely is a true force many despise, and the more they try to silence Andrew Tate, the more he looks innocent. What do you think?
More about Andrew Tate: CobraTate.com
More Sources:
Featured Photo Credit: Vadim Ghirda via https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/29/tate-brothers-will-return-uk-face-rape-charges/
p.p.s The Telegraph article is behind a Membership/PayWall and loaded with their own financial ads. You won’t find pop-ups on PNW Social News because we’re not being paid to say this. Thanks again for reading.
