The Devils of Ex Parte are not what you might think. Many have misjudged me in Ex Parte hearings and I am here to set the record straight in hope for positive change.
What is Ex Parte
In the Family Court arena, an Ex Parte hearing is when one side gets to present alleged evidence of supposed “Immediate Danger” and the Judge usually rules after only hearing one side of the story.
In many cases that evidence is hearsay and can be twisted by the person presenting it.
An Immediate Danger Ex Parte hearing is not inherently bad all by itself, and in some cases they do actually help protect children from real harm.
In other cases, the Immediate Danger Ex Parte hearing is used as a weapon by the true villain of the story to hurt the other parent at the expense of the children involved.
That is what has happened to me, more than once.
The words Ex Parte are Latin meaning “from one side” and the hearings are often very one-side on behalf of just one party that can be presenting false evidence on purpose. In the Family Courts, Ex Parte describes the proceeding that usually only involves one party without representation, and they do not need to give actual notice to the other party prior to the hearing.
The results of a jaded Ex Parte hearing can be devastating, and they can destroy a family, parent and a child’s life in just one day, leaving a wake of destruction.
The Devils of Ex Parte
The “Devils of Ex Parte” are the statutory codes that give the presumed power to take a child from a loving parent in violation of their Constitutional Rights based on lies and hearsay evidence.
It’s not the Judges.
It’s not the “Courts” per-say.
It’s the statutory codes that give the presumed power to take a child from a loving parent because the true villain of the story has an axe to grind for whatever reason.
Overly Empathetic Judges
In my cases, I believe the Judges have been overly empathetic to very good bad actors. We have all met bad actors in our lives, the ones who are good at putting on a show and crafting a web of lies regardless of truth and without regard to the damage being done to the other parent or child.
Family Court Judges are supposed to rule based on the “best interest of the child” in these hearings, but what if they are being lied to?
What if they are being asked to trample your Inalienable Rights within the Constitution such as the right to a jury trial prior to removing your child?
Inalienable Rights = God Given Rights
Yes, I said “God” given rights, because you were born with them and many of the ancient Maxims of law date back to biblical times.
Once you start to learn more about your true “Inalienable” rights, you start to understand that they are talking about your God given rights.
Take it or leave it, but that’s the truth.
Ancient Maxims and Inalienable rights
If you want to use Inalienable rights instead of God given rights, you can, that is also your right to do so. But sooner or later you will start finding Maxims of Law from actual scripture. Yep, that is not a joke.
Here are some examples of Maxims of Law from biblical times and scripture:
Maxim: “In law and commerce, truth is sovereign; perjury or false witness is forbidden.”
Scripture: “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor” – Exodus 20:16
Maxim: “No person shall be condemned or a matter established upon the word of a single witness”
Scripture: “At the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established” is from Deuteronomy 19:15, but that very same mantra can be found throughout the Bible in many places.
Matthew 18:16 says: “But if they will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’,
2nd Corinthians 13:1 reads: “This will be my third visit to you. ‘Every matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’
In fact, you can even find it in 1st Timothy 5:19 which says: “Do not entertain an accusation against an elder unless it is brought by two or three witnesses.”
Once you start to learn the Maxims of Law, you start to see how far many can be traced back to the scriptures.
Now let me ask you this question, could that be one of the reasons the secular word continually downplays scriptures and the Bible?
I’m asking specifically because if any of you have been to Family Court, many already know that it only takes one false allegation in Ex Parte to make life a living hell for you and your children.
Ex Parte Can Make Life a Living Hell
In my case, Clackamas County Court Judge Ann Lininger ruled in Ex Parte against me based on falsified hearsay evidence that was taken completely out of context.
Did she do it on purpose because she’s out to get me? I am not sure, but I do not think that was her actual intent because that would be crazy (of her). I believe she was given false information about me by someone try to gain the advantage in court by weaponizing the system.
I told my EX that I was going to report the neglect/abuse of my son, DV, and her theft of property. That very same month she was plotting her Family Court retaliation. She spent nearly 6 months crafting the lies against me, and she won by default, at least for the time being, without me ever being heard by the courts.
Family Court Retaliation
The latest Ex Parte hearing by my EX was initiated to cover up their own actions, and her entire Family Court retaliation process started right after this happened (see image below).
Here is Vuk Lesi at one of the exchanges.
Clackamas County Family Court Case Fraud
Watch this video linked below and take a look at what an Ex Parte hearing can do to a loving father and his child to see exactly how and why Ex Parte hearings in Clackamas County Family Court can become what nightmares are made of. In one day, without your knowledge, everything you love can be stripped away right out of your arms, and “they” call it legal even though it violates your Inalienable Constitutional Rights.
Lies in Clackamas County Court & Deleted Court Records
After that happened, I went to file against it in court and I was illegally detained under threat of arrest in a jury room because I found out that my EX’s friend actually worked for the Clackamas County Courthouse in the mailroom. When she walked out of the back office and saw me, she had the Sheriff immediately detained me under threat of arrest and I was interrogated in a jury room.
When I cam back later that week to protest outside of the courthouse, she threatened me with Stalking which was not true, and then she actually filed it.
Now, that case has been deleted from the courthouse records after I proved it was all lies. They took it all the way to trial and they committed alleged perjury under Oath. I say “they” because even my EX testified against me in that case that was still dismissed because it was not true and I proved it was all lies.
Below is page one of the case I beat that has now been deleted from the record.
Lies Under Oath
Read the lies under Oath and watch what really happened (video link below image). You will clearly see that the statements made under Oath were not true, and you will see why the good Judge dismissed the malicious case against me.
How it started with the 1st Ex Parte Ruling
The first Ex Parte hearing was initiated to cover up what you see below because the neglect/abuse of my son has been going on for years, but every time I try to report it, I am attacked in Family Court by my EX attempting to cover it up.
They sent the Summons seen below to the wrong address in order to claim I was not showing up to court on purpose.
Because I was not served, I had no idea there was even a court hearing regarding the case. Judge Todd Van Rysselberghe ruled to grant an Immediate Danger Order. This year, the very same Judge Todd Van Rysselberghe also ruled in default against me for a second time when I was not given Due Process of Law via proper service or notification of the court hearing, again.
Alleged Conspiracy to Interfere with Custody
This entire ordeal happened during my Family Court case in what I have alleged is a conspiracy to interfere with my custody.
When I go to court to file, I am told to “get my papers and leave” by the Sheriff who removed me from the courtroom. Three days later, the very same court that would not even let me speak about the alleged DV and abuse my son suffers, awarded an false Immediate Danger Order to my EX who sent the SWAT Team to take my son.
Conclusion
Judges are being manipulated in Ex Parte hearings by bad actors who know exactly how to play the system.
Believing an Ex Parte hearing is like believe the MSM News is always telling you the truth.
This article headline and the image are to create awareness for that, and everyone who thinks they know me based on social media posts has misjudged me.
Social Media is not real life and all parties should be heard before drastic “Blunt” actions are taken that can make life a living hell for children.
People are waking up and I believe that positive change is on the horizon.
I do not know Judge Ann Lininger because we’ve never met, although I wish we had in court so that I could be heard. Like I said, I believe she was overly empathetic to a bad actor presenting twisted hearsay evidence from posts that I allegedly made taken out of context. However, they have mass flagged the posts used in court so I do not even know if they are the posts I made, and they were flagged because they prove that everything was taken out of context. Now, my son is suffering because of a bad judgement in Ex Parte.
The statutory codes that allow the presumed power of Ex Parte rulings to take children are the true Devils of Ex Parte because they violate Inalienable Constitutional Rights and go against Ancient Maxims of law from scripture.
Thank you for reading and stay tuned for the next article in this series.
Start Learning Your Rights
I am not an attorney and this is not legal advice. I have been studying the “law” day and night ever since my rights were violated and my son Leonidas was taken without Due Process of Law and without a Jury Trial De Novo.
I am not and do not want to ever want to teach law, nor pretend to, but creating awareness for the issues plaguing our judicial system is crucial for positive change. After taking several classes from multiple educators, I have found that WeThePeople.University/ education platform and app is very well presented. I also like David Jose lives and lessons.
Here are a few Maxims of Law from one of the books I have been studying called Maxims of Law by Charles A Weisman:
It is not just and right that he who exposes the faults of a guilty person should be condemned on that account; for it is proper and expedient that the offense of the guilty should be known. C.L.M.
It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Story, Eq. Jur. s. 389, 390.
An agreement induced by fraud cannot stand. Dig. 2, 14, 7, s. 9.
He who does not freely speak the truth is a betrayer of the truth. Black’s, 2d. 979; 4 Inst. Epil.; Bouv. 152.
Suppression of the truth is equivalent to the expression (or suggestion) of what is false. Addington v. Allen, 11 Wend. (N.Y.) 374, 417. Paul v. Haddley, 23 Barb. (N.Y.) 521, 525.
More Sources: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/ex_parte
